Sunday, 31 March 2013

TGI...


As for many, Friday is my favourite day of the week.  Now that I ‘work from home’, though, not for the usual reasons.  It begins with an individual tango lesson, where for an hour or so I enjoy expert professional guidance and the full attention of my good friend.  I leave feeling energised, optimistic and cycle to the Amnesty bookshop on Mill Road for my weekly volunteer slot.  The next two hours are unpredictable – sometimes busy, sometimes solitary, often enlivened by encounters with – well, unusual individuals.  I regularly come away with something new to read and always with a sense of satisfaction: it’s rarely one-to-one, but something about the couple of hours I spend there has that added value feeling.

So I wasn’t particularly looking forward to last Friday’s extra: from Mill Road on the Number 2 bus to Addenbrookes to take part in the ‘microbubble survey’.  Also voluntary, the opportunity arose from a recent diagnosis and I knew more or less what to expect.  Under local anaesthetic, my right breast would be injected with a (colourless) dye which would then be tracked via ultrasound along its route to the lymph nodes, where the first port of call would be clipped.  The accuracy of the ultrasound procedure would be confirmed or not during surgery after the weekend. No direct benefit for me, then, but the potential for developing improved and less invasive treatments for future patients with breast cancer. 

I was up for a bit of pain, although in the event there was almost none.  In fact, it was fascinating, the minor discomforts of squirming round on the bed more than outweighed by watching the dye magically solidify into identifiable grains which crept steadily along to their destination.  In duller moments we talked roses and gardens, so that the sanitised air of the consulting room filled with the lingering scents of last summer.  I was almost as excited as my team of two radiographers when the sentinel node was identified and clipped; I even got a photo of the result!  They treated me as an equal and with friendly respect, a person-centred approach which left me with an extension of that Friday feeling, and which has characterised every interaction with the unit over the last six weeks, so that I’m outraged by the recent clamouring to get on the bandwagon of rubbishing the NHS.  I think of how our mothers and fathers and their mothers and fathers fought for a public health system that didn’t depend on the ability to pay (my mum still can’t go to the doctor without worrying herself sicker) and of friends of mine who worked for years abroad because they wanted to share the benefits we enjoy with those who had less.  I visited clinics in Tanzania where water had to be boiled.  I remember the day we had a car crash in Mexico and were taken to a public hospital where the police watched our every move, even in the toilets (no doors), and the day shortly afterwards when my genial (private and expensive) doctor sent me away with the reassurance that my stomach cramps were ‘only wind’ just hours before I lost the baby.  A similar tale of health care (or the lack of) abroad in Friday’s Guardian from NHS chief Sir Bruce Keogh highlights just how fortunate we are.

Of course there are mistakes; in a system which employs more than 1.7 million and deals with over 1 million people every 36 hours, how couldn’t there be?  The latest news story (the closure of the children’s heart unit at Leeds Infirmary) is a troubling example but, even if the figures are correct (and Paul Taylor on ‘Rigging the Death Rate’ in the London Review of Books reminds us how misleading such statistics are likely to be), this represents a local and specific failing rather than a failure of the whole enterprise.  I think it’s criminal that stories like this one are used as a stick to beat the health service with.  Imagine how it feels to be working within the NHS, doing a good job in difficult circumstances as so many do, and waking  up to this kind of drubbing day after day!  After years in the classroom I know all about being demoralised.  I remember the horrors of Ofsted, both pre-arranged and then unannounced, and all our sleepless nights, and how we got better only at weathering inspections.  I can remember driving to school in the later years with the radio on and thinking if I hear one more report of incompetent teachers in bad schools, I won’t be able to finish this journey.  Six years after I left, I still have anxiety dreams about being a failure as a teacher.

This weekend we’re in Norfolk.  I come down early to find mum in the kitchen, bag packed, coat on over her nightie.  What are you doing here? she says.  We’re at the cottage, Mum, I say.   Oh I thought I was in someone else’s apartment and I panicked.   If I’d come down ten minutes later, would she have been wandering along the village’s main road?  We’re just about at the point where we need more help and all my dad’s BUPA payments aren’t going to save us any more than they did him.  Perhaps he got his money’s worth?  In his last weeks, though, it was the good old Derby Royal Infirmary that stepped in and looked after him, and us, as if he were a king.  Or rather, as if he and the rest of the family were really worth something just for being human.  When his wonderful consultant Dr Chakraborti arrived on the ward to see him, as he did every day, you could see my dad grow in the warmth of his regard.  Despite the cancer, the NHS gave my dad a very easy death.

Of course there’s cancer and cancer.  Mine, apparently, is ‘Grade One: favourable’.  Here’s how it goes: after a routine mammogram, I get a call-back.  There is a small shadowy area in the right breast.  After much searching, the ultrasound picks up a tiny lump, buried so deep I would never have found it.  There’s a biopsy and, a week later, the diagnosis, delivered in person by the consultant/surgeon and his team.  What happens next is explained clearly, so that I turn up for the operation feeling reasonably confident.  I queue with the others to get into the ward at 7 am.  ‘Passports?’ a joker in the line says.  Actually it’s more like a railway station.  Some are sent straight to beds; others, like me, to a waiting room.  On a wander I bump into my (‘my’!) surgeon in a knot of people in green scrubs.  He is still wearing his jacket and an interesting tie.  O hi, he says.  How are you?  A bit hectic in here this morning, but don’t worry, we’ll find a bed for you soon.  I’m not worried; again, I’m feeling like one of the team.  Everyone I meet knows who I am, where I am.  I spend the morning waiting, reading, striding to other bits of the huge hospital site for an injection and to have a guide wire inserted so that they don’t have to poke around too much to find what they’re looking for.  I make a new friend whose lump is Grade 3 – like a hard-boiled egg, she says.  She has a marvellous tattoo of a bird in a rose bush which winds its way across her hips and up the side of her body.  Shittin hell, she says when it’s her turn.  And then it’s mine.  I get to walk down and into theatre; like a grown-up, I think.

I believe this is a good thing.  Those days of being a patient, lying back and quietly suffering while things were done to you, no questions asked, are dead and buried, or should be.  We know about diet and exercise and have access to a world of information to help us stay healthy.  If you suffer from a chronic condition, it’s easy enough just to take the tablets and get lost in the system but better by far to ask for what you need, make a fuss, take some responsibility for what is, after all, your own body, your present, your future.
Behemoth and Leviathan, watercolour byWilliam Blake
 from his Illustrations of the Book of Job

The following Friday is Good Friday.  And two days later, Easter Sunday, I get to remove the dressings: two neat rows of steristrips; no pain; no swelling or infection.  All set for a complete recovery.  You might think I’m one of the lucky ones.  Of course I am, but I reckon so are all of us.  I’m sure, like me, you signed all the petitions to protect what Bruce Keogh describes as our ‘greatest social icon’.   Whilst he is dedicated to improving the service, he reminds us that, according to surveys, 90% of patients think the service they got was good or great.  Jonathan Freedland, also in Good Friday’s Guardian, suggests that the North Staffs scandal was a mark of human weakness rather than an NHS problem.  Today I feel like focusing on our strengths: if a Behemoth like the NHS can manage a wholly person-centred approach, maybe that’s a cause for celebration.  As well as something worth fighting for.

Thursday, 28 March 2013

simply the best



‘World’s best restaurant serves up stomach bug to 60 diners’ (Guardian Saturday 9 March).  Not a good start to a weekend if Noma is your baby.  Even so, I don't imagine the story significantly cut the three-month wait for a reservation, and the Copenhagen team still look pretty pleased with the way things are.  I’m unlikely to see for myself in the foreseeable future: at around £300 a head with wine, it’s well beyond my reach.  I love eating out (as long as the food and company are good) and love being cooked for – but can any meal, however wonderful, really be worth that much? 


Of course it’s all a matter of personal choice.  The other evening, around Anna’s table, we gave up trying to decide whether we preferred our gnocchi with courgette and pesto or blue cheese and mascarpone (both delicious) and drifted onto our reading.  ‘What’s the best book you’ve read in the last year?’ was my question.  I’ve felt wrong-footed repeatedly by critical opinion where the superlatives jostle for supremacy and have just been disappointed yet again by the latest ‘absolute must-read’.  I don’t think this is sour grapes.  Anyway, we agreed that McEwan’s Saturday was high on our list, and we batted other big names about in an unsurprisingly disparate field: Ishiguro and Boyd, Joseph Conrad and Ann Tyler.  How subjective the whole thing is was emphasised when Anna objected to a book I’d recommended on the grounds that it made her cringe!  Well, then.

On a couple of occasions recently I’ve found myself caught up in a conversation about the best dancer.  Unlike book-based arguments, this is not a topic I enjoy.  In fact it leaves me feeling upset, almost.  This is probably not surprising: however hard I work, however well I keep my particular physical constraints at bay, I will never be up there.  Of course social tango isn’t a competition, or so we say; but if there’s a notion of best, then that must imply there’s a worst, and a whole hierarchy in between.  

So I’m drawn into wondering how we measure, what criteria we use.  It can’t be years of experience (I’m 11 years in) though perhaps experience counts for something.  A repertoire of steps?  I guess on a skills mastered basis this might be a way of quantifying what you’ve learnt, and then perhaps a basic understanding of the ‘move’ (immediately I’m back nearly twenty years with my son and his friends practising the kicks and flicks of a Power Ranger) could be further graded according to performance: Level One competent, Level Two fluent...)

I’m sure fluency must come into it somewhere.   Certainly if I’m sitting on the edge of the dance floor there’s a real pleasure in watching a dancer whose movements flow like water or ripple like silk.  Some dancers I could watch for ever and not get bored, but not always for the same aspect.  One favourite displays an enviable poise and thoughtfulness, another you could characterise as playful; grace is a big pull for me – ah, now my favourite graceful dancer knows who I mean!

Pablo Rodriguez & Noelia Hurtado
I don’t honestly know how high the appearance stakes are – there’s little to beat witnessing a wonderful performance – apart from experiencing for yourself a wonderful dance, that is.  So some of our judgement (if judge we must, and it seems we do) must rely on the experience; on how it feels.  ‘Buttery,’ John suggested once. No doubt if you’re a dancer you will have your own descriptors for that magical feeling.  For sure I know that the experience doesn’t always match the impression you might have formed from observing your partner before you take to the floor.  One of my favourite partners is someone whose first invitation I accepted with trepidation.  And of course it works the other way too. 

The biggest disappointment is usually myself, of course.  I can dance beautifully in my head.  I have a keen sense of rhythm, know a bit about the music.  Often, though, a small mistake or a minor wobble on my part will intrude on the moment, and confidence and control evaporate simultaneously; if I were a skier (god forbid) I’d be careering down an icy incline, legs flailing, heading for the nearest tree.  

So I wonder what qualities you need to make skiing an amazing experience, aside from the basics, and whether these qualities are transferable?  Something about focus, perhaps, or control, or readiness for risk?  Perhaps it's more to do with giving yourself wholly to the moment; being as well prepared as you can be, certainly, having learnt and practised, but being able now to put all that behind you, the rules, the worries about what you can or can't or how good or bad you might be, and just go for it.

If skiing is your passion, imagine that moment at the top of a slope, and double it: the anticipation! the terror! the possibility that this descent might be the most fantastic ever!  As I step onto the dance floor and into your arms, I mean to leave behind my insecurities and my judgments and trust that you will do the same.  I may not be the best dancer you have ever met but the next three minutes might, just might, be the best.

Saturday, 2 March 2013

The thing about me


Last Sunday I have a visit from Peter: he’s read the first ten chapters of my novel and has some feedback for me.  Whilst I make tea he prowls the kitchen until he finds – well what on earth? his expression says.  He has a way of asking a question with a sideways list to the head which makes me smile.  What do you think, I say.  He hazards a few guesses – a honey-drizzler for someone who eats it by the vat? – and then gives up.

It’s a hot chocolate maker; a whisk, more or less.  It’s made of wood, quite light, and has a slim, turned handle.  The upper half – the whisking bit – is carved, hand-carved I think though the thing itself is machine-made, into a series of notched shapes around the central stem, so that it has a sequence of waists.  Three of the waists are encircled by a loose ring, each carved with a different pattern and held in place by the body above and below but free to spin in its orbit.  If you shake it, the thing clicks and chuckles like a rattle.  The top end is shaped like a double flower head.  Between the two sets of petals is a kind of squashed hollow orb, with a row of little eyes cut into its circumference.  I am sure the whole thing has been fashioned from a single piece of wood but, when I examine it, I can’t figure out how this final embellishment has been made. 

This morning I catch the end of a radio item they call The Thing About You: what is the most precious thing in your life, the one thing you would save if your house were on fire, the item which defines and reassures you?  A man speaks about a carved dog from a concentration camp and tells his father’s story.  I think about my house burning and think I might save this chocolate maker, which has its own odd history.  It was given to me by another Peter on another Sunday 25 years ago, in a market in Tepotzlán, up in the hills outside Mexico City.  It was a holiday weekend, I think, always an encouragement to escape from the capital, and Peter was one of my few friends with a car.  Unlike the rest of us, young teachers from the UK and Canada happy to exist on a shoestring in return for a spell away from the confines of home, Peter had another, proper job as an orthodontist.  Teaching was something he did in his spare time, when he wasn’t throwing wild parties or planning elaborate excursions.  He loved to outrage: one story has him dancing naked with his two Siamese cats; another, less happy, involved him being picked up on the street in San Angel in the early hours of one morning, very drunk, thrown in the back of a car and deposited eventually stripped of everything (clothes, wallet, shoes) apart from his underpants.  

He died some years ago after what I imagine must have been a horrid and lingering illness.  I like to remember him for his excesses, for his odd mixture of generosity and meanness.  I went to the coast with him one weekend and he stayed in the Hilton whilst I battled the cockroaches in a dormitory at the other end of town.  I hadn’t been long in the country and he enjoyed my naivety, I think, watching my reactions as we scoured the stalls for magic remedies – Tepotzlán was famous for its witches – and translating the simplest phrases into Scottish Highlands camp.  This pretty little toy cost a few pesos at most but he presented it to me formally as if it were a treasure: ‘Kate, bienvenido a Mexico – welcome to Mexico.’  

Ever since I came back to England it’s lived in a corner of the kitchen, upended in a Mexican cup, gathering dust, whilst my family of two grew to accommodate a baby and then shrank again.  In the unhinged early days of single parenthood, the chocolate-maker became a microphone we passed between us every time we heard the opening bars of Feeder’s ‘Buck Rogers’, a verse apiece – you know, ‘He’s got a brand new car, Looks like a jag-u-ar, It’s got leather seats, It’s got a CD player (player player player...)  But I don’t wanna talk about it any more.’   The chorus took the two voices, mother and son, shouting our survival into the chipped petalled mike:

I think we're gonna make it
I think we're gonna save it yeah
So don't you try and fake it
Anymore, anymore

We'll start over again
Grow ourselves new skin
Get a house in Devon
Drink cider from a lemon (lemon, lemon, lemon...)

I never knew who Buck Rogers was, and we never made it to Devon.  We’re still going, though.   And the whisk: has lost a couple of petals and I’m not sure I fancy woodworm in my hot chocolate.  It’s a good reminder, though: old friends, far-away places, someone taking the trouble to make a useful bit of kitchen equipment beautiful and a taste of the exotic – cinnamon, sugar, warm milk and dark dark chocolate.